Why Did I Use the Term Zionist?

Introduction

The term "Zionist" is used to describe the building manager, Mikael Yardim, because the author perceives his actions and behaviors as being characteristic of Zionist ideology and tactics. Here are some reasons why the author might have used this term:

1. Manipulation and Control

Zionist Tactics: The author likely sees Mikael Yardim's manipulation and control over the building and its residents as similar to the tactics used by Zionists to exert influence and control. This includes creating divisions, spreading misinformation, and using psychological manipulation.

Example: Mikael Yardim's use of lies, threats, and psychological attacks to maintain control over the building and its residents mirrors the author's perception of Zionist strategies.

2. Self-Interest and Greed

Zionist Motivation: The author might associate Zionism with a focus on self-interest and greed, which he sees in Mikael Yardim's actions. Mikael's exploitation of the building's common areas and illegal activities for personal gain aligns with this perception.

Example: Mikael Yardim's illegal use of the building's common areas and his threats to demolish illegal enlargements to stay as the manager reflect a self-serving attitude.

3. Cover-Up and Deception

Zionist Deception: The author sees Mikael Yardim's efforts to cover up illegal activities and deceive others as characteristic of Zionist tactics. This includes manipulating information and creating false narratives.

Example: Mikael Yardim's lies about the heating pipes and his attempts to cover up the building's structural issues highlight his deceptive practices.

4. Systemic Corruption

Zionist Influence: The author might believe that Mikael Yardim's actions are part of a broader systemic corruption that he associates with Zionist influence. This includes the municipality's cover-ups and the judiciary's failure to uphold justice.

Example: The author's struggle against the municipality's cover-ups and the judiciary's acceptance of the conservatorship case against him reflects his perception of systemic corruption.

5. Historical Context

Historical Associations: The author might draw on historical associations between Zionism and authoritarianism, control, and exploitation. Mikael Yardim's actions and the broader systemic issues he faces may evoke these historical associations.

Example: Mikael Yardim's use of a Turkish military entrance card and his connections to the ex-Turkish military might evoke historical associations with Zionist influence and control.

Conclusion

The author uses the term "Zionist" to describe Mikael Yardim because he perceives his actions and behaviors as being characteristic of Zionist ideology and tactics. This includes manipulation, self-interest, deception, systemic corruption, and historical associations. By using this term, the author is highlighting what he sees as the broader implications and characteristics of Mikael Yardim's actions within the context of his personal struggle and the systemic issues he faces.

Reinforcing the Use of "Zionist"

Behavioral Patterns: Mikael Yardim's use of manipulation, lies, and psychological attacks to control the building and its residents aligns with the author's perception of Zionist tactics.

Example: Mikael's insistence on changing the heating pipes despite their proper functioning and his threats to cut off heating to the author's apartment are seen as manipulative and controlling behaviors.

Self-Interest and Exploitation

Exploitative Practices: Mikael Yardim's exploitation of the building's common areas and illegal activities for personal gain reflects a self-serving attitude that the author associates with Zionist ideology.

Example: Mikael's use of the building's backyard garden, basement storage, and parking spots for his daughter's tenants and his own personal use highlights his exploitative practices.

Cover-Up and Deception

Deceptive Actions: Mikael Yardim's efforts to cover up illegal activities and deceive others are seen as characteristic of Zionist tactics, which often involve manipulating information and creating false narratives.

Example: Mikael's lies about the heating pipes and his attempts to cover up the building's structural issues demonstrate his deceptive actions.

Systemic Corruption

Broader Systemic Issues: The author believes that Mikael Yardim's actions are part of a broader systemic corruption that he associates with Zionist influence. This includes the municipality's cover-ups and the judiciary's failure to uphold justice.

Example: The author's struggle against the municipality's cover-ups and the judiciary's acceptance of the conservatorship case against him reflects his perception of systemic corruption.

Historical and Political Context

Historical Associations: The author might draw on historical associations between Zionism and authoritarianism, control, and exploitation. Mikael Yardim's actions and the broader systemic issues he faces may evoke these historical associations.

Example: Mikael's use of a Turkish military entrance card and his connections to the ex-Turkish military might evoke historical associations with Zionist influence and control.

Personal Experience and Perception

Personal Struggle: The author's personal struggle against Mikael Yardim and the broader systemic issues he faces shapes his perception of Mikael's actions. The term "Zionist" serves as a way to encapsulate the author's experience and the behaviors he associates with Mikael.

Example: The author's repeated encounters with Mikael's manipulative and deceptive tactics, as well as the broader systemic corruption, lead him to use the term "Zionist" to describe Mikael.

Conclusion

The term "Zionist" is fitting because it encapsulates the specific set of behaviors and tactics that the author associates with Mikael Yardim. This includes manipulation, self-interest, deception, systemic corruption, and historical associations. By using this term, the author is highlighting what he sees as the broader implications and characteristics of Mikael Yardim's actions within the context of his personal struggle and the systemic issues he faces.

Summary

This document details the author's struggle against illegal building practices and safety violations in his apartment building in Moda, Istanbul. Constructed 50 years ago with substandard materials, the building poses significant risks, especially given Istanbul's high earthquake probability. The author's initial complaints about structural safety were met with resistance from the building manager, Mikael Yardim, and other apartment owners. Despite warnings and legal actions, the municipality covered up official reports, and the judiciary failed to uphold justice. The author's relentless fight for safety and justice is fully documented with physical evidence, including official municipality reports, court documents, and correspondence. This story highlights the broader issues of corruption, lack of accountability, and the disregard for public safety in Turkey. For a detailed account of the author's journey and the broader implications of this case, read the full document.